
Global Shipping Industry Urges U.S. to Delay Port Fees on Chinese-Built Vessels
More than 200 business, trade and maritime shipping organizations are urging the U.S. administration to extend the suspension of Section 301 tariffs and port fees on Chinese-built vessels, warning that renewed charges could increase ocean freight costs, logistics expenses and supply-chain uncertainty. The appeal comes as U.S. President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping meet at the White House for trade talks.
In a September 23 letter to U.S. Trade Representative (USTR) Jamieson Greer, the coalition asked the administration to delay the maritime fees before the current suspension expires on November 9, 2026. The groups include the International Chamber of Shipping, World Shipping Council and Chamber of Shipping of America, along with more than 200 importers, exporters and transportation organizations.

Shipping Groups Warn of Higher Freight and Supply-Chain Costs
The organizations said China-built vessels represent a significant share of global ocean carrier capacity. They warned that renewed port fees and tariffs could therefore affect shipping networks well beyond companies directly connected to Chinese vessel ownership or shipbuilding.
The coalition said additional charges could influence vessel deployment decisions and raise uncertainty for businesses that have limited control over the ownership, operation or construction history of the ships carrying their cargo.
The groups also highlighted continuing pressure on U.S. supply chains. Businesses are dealing with higher costs for ocean freight, trucking, warehousing, insurance and inventory management, with the coalition warning that these expenses ultimately affect U.S. businesses, workers, farmers and consumers.
U.S.-China Maritime Fee Suspension Set to Expire
The USTR announced on November 9, 2025, that it would suspend for one year the responsive actions taken under its Section 301 investigation into China’s maritime, logistics and shipbuilding sectors. The suspension began on November 10, 2025.
The suspension covers the responsive maritime measures described by USTR, including fees involving Chinese-built ships and Chinese vessel owners or operators, as well as measures affecting certain foreign-built vehicle carriers. USTR’s formal notice states that the suspension continues through 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on November 9, 2026.
China had also announced a one-year suspension of its retaliatory port fees against U.S.-linked shipping. If the U.S. measures return without a further extension, the coalition expects the corresponding Chinese measures to be reinstated as well.
Trump-Xi Summit Leaves Maritime Fees Unaddressed
Trump and Xi did not specifically mention the maritime fees in their opening public remarks at the White House summit. Their statements instead focused on broader cooperation between the United States and China.
Xi said the interests of the two countries were closely connected and highlighted opportunities for cooperation. He also said China remained open to American companies and expressed hope that Chinese companies would receive fair treatment in the United States.
Shipping Market Insight: Port Fees and International Freight Costs
The significance of the dispute extends beyond the fee paid by an individual vessel. International shipping operates through interconnected networks of shipowners, operators, charterers, ports, cargo owners and logistics providers. A change in the cost of operating or deploying particular vessels can therefore affect commercial planning across the wider supply chain.
For carriers and cargo interests, the main concern is the combination of higher shipping costs and regulatory uncertainty. Changes in port-fee policy can influence vessel deployment, transportation costs and supply-chain planning, particularly when companies are already managing elevated freight, insurance and logistics expenses.
The issue is also closely connected to the wider U.S.-China dispute over maritime trade, shipbuilding and supply-chain policy. USTR’s original 2025 action was specifically aimed at China’s role in the maritime, logistics and shipbuilding sectors, while the subsequent suspension was intended to provide time for negotiations and related policy discussions.
Shipping Industry Seeks Greater Regulatory Certainty
With the November deadline approaching, the shipping and business coalition is seeking clarity before companies have to plan for the possible return of the U.S. maritime measures.
For shipping companies, importers, exporters and logistics providers, the decision could have implications for freight costs, vessel deployment and international supply-chain planning. The USTR’s next decision will determine whether the current suspension continues or the measures covered by the suspension become effective again after November 9.
